A Better Way to Handle Blog Comments

How do you interact with readers of your blog without handing over control?

One of the most graceful practitioners of the reader comment is Andrew Sullivan, who’s been writing his blog The Dish (née The Daily Dish) since 2000.

The Dish doesn’t allow direct commenting. There is no comments box at the end of a Dish post. To tender your opinion, you have to email it to the Dish—if you can find the well-hidden email link.

But you better believe these people read their emails. And when they get comments they think are worthwhile, they get published as blogposts.

A post last week about Black Friday elicited a number of email comments, which The Dish promptly turned into a blogpost:

There are many things to love about this technique:

  • Readers get a voice, while The Dish retains almost total editorial control
  • Comments can be cherrypicked to include only the best, and each comment shortened to include only its key point
  • The dialogue gets extended, with no risk of expletives, disparagement, or fights
  • The Dish demonstrates that it’s listening to its readers and holding itself accountable to them (a blogging ethic not to be underestimated)
  • It’s really easy to create—no writing necessary

This is also a great way to handle corrections or emendations:

Given FINRA’s Regulatory Notice 11-39, this approach to comments has no additional compliance hurdles if you’re already blogging. Just continue archiving and monitoring your posts.

You are doing that, aren’t you?

 

 

  • Share/Bookmark

FINRA Social Cheat Sheet

In all the articles and blogposts on FINRA and social media, we’ve yet to see a practical, at-a-glance guide that puts it all together they way we like it—on one side of one piece of paper.

We wanted the big picture and the small details. What requires RP approval? How would FINRA treat a private tweet? Can a fund company engage in group discussions on LinkedIn?

How We Did It

So we decided to create it ourselves. First, we pored all the relevant FINRA/NASD Rules, Regulatory Notices, and online content. Then we grouped the features of every major social network according to FINRA’s six “communications categories.” We asked for and received great feedback from a number of LinkedIn groups (thank you all!). Where we could, we inferred how some of the best firms are interpreting FINRA guidelines.

Finally, we ran a first draft by a number of marketing and compliance professionals at firms such as Legg Mason and Bank of America (of course, that’s not an endorsement by any company).

Here’s the result (click for printable PDF). Viewed in color, it chunks up which things require prior approval, supervision, and monitoring.

Our take on how FINRA regs play out on social media

Sources: NASD Rules 2210, 2211, 2310, 2711, 3010, 3110, IM 2210-1, NASD Notice to Members 99-03, FINRA Regulatory Notices 09-55, 10-06, 07-59, FINRA’s Guide to the Internet for Registered Representatives, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 206(4).

As always, we welcome all suggestions for improvement.

 

Takeaways

What’s new here is the presentation, not so much the implications. But our guide does clarify a few things:

  • Almost every activity on social media requires prior registered principal approval
  • Interactive e-communications is, for the time being, largely a ghost category. Until FINRA provides more guidance as to what it means, only live chat (e.g. Facebook’s) seems to make the cut.
  • Things will get clearer and simpler with time, as everyone gets more experienced on social media and as FINRA reduces the communications categories to as few as three.

We’ve drawn a few lines in the sand, too. Some say retweets could be considered recommendations and therefore shouldn’t be allowed. But TIAA-CREF seems to think otherwise, and we’d agree. Some say tweets are interactive e-communications, with no prior approval required. But the timing on Fidelity’s Twitter replies suggests to us that a Fidelity RP is approving every tweet. A good idea.

Who Reviews?

OK, so FINRA-regulated firms can do a lot with social media (many already are). How are they going to satisfy FINRA’s review and recordkeeping requirements? Automation isn’t necessary, but without it social media will be a headache and not as effective as it could be for most firms.

Of the software available today, one application excels at analytics and another at creating an auditable trail. None offers the robust review that, in our experience, most enterprises will need. But more on that in a future post.

Meantime, this guide is helping us think about how we implement social media strategies for our clients. We hope it helps you, too.

  • Share/Bookmark